Close

Why a defunct Leftist magazine was revived

  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
Why a defunct Leftist magazine was revived
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  

In 2009, a defunct magazine, The Caravan, was revived as a long-form narrative journalism magazine on the model of The New Yorker.[i]

The first issue of the revived magazine hit the stands in 2010.[ii]Though the tone was mild compared to the avowedly left/Marxist  Frontline, its readers were convinced that nothing had changed about the political-ideological affiliation of the magazine. The Caravan remained left. Yet something was different this time. As subsequent issues rolled out, it became increasingly clear that this time it was much more than simply a run-of-the-mill left-of-center magazine. In its revamped avatar, the magazine was unabashedly anti-Hindu.

In the two decades that had passed since Caravan ceased publication in 1988, spectacular changes had occurred in the world.

With the collapse of the Soviet Union many statues of Stalin and Lenin were toppled. (Picture Credit: www.tonigiro.net)

The Soviet Union had collapsed in 1989. Together with its demise, the financial lifeline of all the institutions that it had propped up all over the world also snapped. Other institutions that were not directly supported but ideologically inspired by the Soviet Union and communism were also in a quandary. Their god-who-is-not-God had failed. Many such institutions shut down all over the world in the late 1980s and early 90s.

For ideological reasons at least, The Caravan magazine that had been in existence since 1940, also came to an end. It was one of the most popular English language magazines from the stable Delhi Press, one of the largest publishing houses in India. With the demise of global communism, there was no hope that The Caravan would ever be revived. So, when the decision to revive it was taken in 2009, it was a bit of a surprise. But as its anti-Hindu agenda became clear in the subsequent issues, the reasons behind its revival also became clear.

That this revival happened when the Congress Party-led United Progressive Alliance (UPA) had been reinstated for a second term was no coincidence. Before we go deeper, we need to look at its parent organization, Delhi Press.

The Story of Delhi Press

Delhi Press is one of the largest and highly diversified magazine publishing houses of India. It was started in 1939 by Vishwa Nath, with the launching of The Caravan, an English literary magazine then. His son Paresh Nath joined the family business in 1970. He is now the publisher and editor-in-chief of the Delhi Press Group. Paresh Nath is the editor of a mind-boggling number of 30 magazines of his own group. This is not normal for any big publishing house. This usually occurs when strict centralized control is needed for maintaining ideological purity. His son, Ananth Nath, the third-generation representative in the family, is the editor of the revived Caravan magazine.

Paresh Nath (right), the publisher and editor-in-chief of Delhi Press (Picture Credit: www.reddit.com)

The group is known for publishing low-priced magazines such as Mukta, Champak, Grihashobha, Woman’s Era, Suman Saurabh, and Saras Salil. These magazines are aimed at different segments of the population with most catering to women and children.

Champak is one of the most famous of children’s magazines. It is a rival of Nandan, the children’s magazine run by the Hindustan Times group. Nandan, until a few years ago, was a cultural magazine, mainly focused on inspirational stories from Hindu scriptures, drawing mostly from the Puranas, drawing modern inferences. On the other hand, Champak was a different kind of children’s magazine. At a time when atheism was unpopular even among adults, the children’s magazine, Champak churned out atheist propaganda, mainly aimed at Hindus and challenging Hinduism. It was full of stories of how Diwali nights degenerate into gambling fights, and how Nava Ratri celebrations are nothing but a platform for hooliganism, always ending in violence. Many stories showed how worshiping murtis (idols) was superstition and how a worldview dominated by science should replace a culture dominated by religion, with the target religion always being Hinduism.

Children are generally unconcerned by ideological matters. Abstract philosophical concepts such as atheism are incomprehensible to most of them. Typically, children often love stories full of fairy tales and magical elements. And there is no dearth of supernatural elements, and all-powerful superhuman beings in Hindu mythology, which was the main reason behind Nandan’s choice to use them as source material. So, when a children’s magazine, Champak, does not just avoid Hindu mythology altogether but portrays it as superstitious, one must wonder about the motivation behind feeding atheism to young minds.

When one looks at other magazines by Delhi Press—Saras Salil and Suman Saurabh aimed at adolescents, one arrives at the same conclusion. Hinduism and Hindu culture come out as redundant, old-fashioned, and superstitious. Of course, no such atheistic disdain is extended towards either Islam or Christianity, or for that matter any of the other religious groups in India.

Sarita, a general audience magazine, is perhaps the best illustration of the model of journalism that Delhi Press espouses. Its goal is social and family reconstruction. Delhi Press describes Sarita as the “… flagship magazine of the group that best embodies its ideology of fighting against religious obscurantism and political authoritarianism. Since its launch, Sarita has maintained a bold stance on issues of national importance and has been at the forefront of a crusade against the ‘fetters that hinder the progress of our society’.”

Phrases like “religious obscurantism,” “political authoritarianism,” and “fetters that hinder the progress of our society” bring a sense of nostalgia for a bygone era. Any comrade would lovingly remember these loaded phrases, transporting one back to the heydays of communism. One look at the section “Religion” on the Sarita magazine’s website reveals its animus against Hinduism and Hindu society. Take a look at this  random selection of titles : “Kavadiyas, the bearer of superstitious traditions,” “The Illusions of (Hindu) Pandits,” “A Fearful society under the weight of obscure (Hindu) customs,” “Vaastu, a charade of (Hindu) religion,” “The Evil Spell of Dharma,” and “Money-making in the name of GharWapasi”.

Magazines published by Delhi Press (Picture credit: www.bestmediainfo.com)

In short, every aspect of Hinduism is viciously attacked. Timeless and sacred religious treks like “Kavad Yatra” are slandered and presented as social nuisance. Needless to say, nothing is said of Islamic extremism, Christian fundamentalism, or the obscurantism in other religious groups. Most of the articles just whitewash Islamic crimes.

Readers of English media are now used to anti-Hindu terminology couched in “atheist” and “secular” phrases. However, the Hindi language articles in Sarita are nakedly anti-Hindu with a language vicious enough to be worthy of any racist publication. In all its publications, Delhi Press is consistent in its animosity towards anything Hindu. It is an extreme Left/Marxist publishing house with a clear ideological agenda.

The frightening aspect is that it caters to a wide range of audiences starting from kindergarten to adults. That no serious academic objection has been made against such a deeply motivated ideological publishing house so far tells how far leftist ideas and propaganda have penetrated Indian society.

Expanding the Reach of the Left

Of late, Delhi Press has embarked on further expansion. It is constantly acquiring old magazines, reviving old ones, and starting new publishing ventures.

In the 21st century, this should raise doubts. Print magazines are unviable economically, and print readership is declining by the day. Many print magazines are shutting shop. And so, in such a dismal scenario, it is curious that Delhi Press is acquiring old magazines on the brink of collapse, like two Kannada language magazines, Nimmellara Manasa and Butti,[iii] or reviving the long defunct magazine like The Caravan.

In this light, it does compel one to think of explanations like foreign funding coupled with ideological sponsorship, aimed at damaging the majority culture and society. Anyone who is familiar with Breaking India by Rajiv Malhotra and Aravindan Neelakandan would recognize such a threat.

(Picture credit: www.amazon.in)

Moreover, the recent acquisitions and talks of Delhi Press make no market sense. The company is not listed on the stock market. It does not sell shares as “it will then become answerable to shareholders and would have to generate profits.[iv] The reason given behind this unwise market decision is that the “company values its independence.” Which does make sense from its perspective. But the counter question arises: What is this “independence” that Delhi Press is talking about? Is it ideological or merely principled journalism? And even if one accepts the principled bit, how is it managing to keep the ship afloat in these dire times? Keep in mind that Delhi Press publications are all low-priced, barely breaking even. The Caravan especially is not profit making.

Delhi Press is one the largest and the only big, stand-alone magazine publishing group in India with a combined readership of over 35 million. Other giants in the business-like the India Today Group, Vikatan Group, and Malayala Manorama Group are in other businesses besides publishing magazines. Most of them finance their magazines by other profit-making enterprises. Delhi Press is the sole exception.[v]

Delhi Press claims that its business model is a combination of subscription and advertising with 60 per cent revenues coming from advertising and 40 per cent from subscriptions.[vi] With most of its magazines barely breaking even and the subscription numbers of the profit-making ones sharply plummeting, it defies belief that the group is in an expansion mode, with a stated goal of acquiring 50 titles soon. It currently has 36 in its kitty.

Its ideological history of leaning to the left; its standalone magazine publishing group status; its current expansion mode; its low-prices and its habit of acquiring sinking titles; and the fact that most of the positive developments for the Group occurred in the torrid years of the decade-long UPA regime, leads us to only one conclusion: that Delhi Press is an anti-Hindu group with powerful patrons who have a vested interest in destabilizing if not destroying  Hindu society and culture.

The next part of this series will examine the ideological and other stances of The Caravan magazine which was relaunched in 2010.

  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  

Pankaj Saxena

Pankaj Saxena is a scholar of History, Hindu Architecture and Literature. He has visited more than 400 sites of ancient Hindu temples and has photographed the evidence. He's also writes articles, research papers and reviews in various print and online newspapers and magazines and is the author of three books.